论文标题
用于估计城市交通对行人过境行为的因果影响的机器学习
Debiased machine learning for estimating the causal effect of urban traffic on pedestrian crossing behaviour
论文作者
论文摘要
在过渡到城市道路并随后在交通状况的前所未有的变化之前,对交通政策和与行人穿越行为有关的未来派道路设计的评估至关重要。最近的研究分析了各种变量在AV存在下对行人等待时间的非毒害影响。但是,我们主要研究交通密度对行人等待时间的因果影响。我们开发了一个双重/依据的机器学习(DML)模型,其中解决了影响政策和兴趣结果的混杂因素的影响,从而实现了无偏见的政策评估。此外,我们尝试通过开发两个主要组成部分的行人交叉行为,行人应力水平和等待时间的主要组成部分来分析交通密度的效果。在文献中已广泛用于解决自我选择问题,可以将其归类为旅行行为建模中的因果分析。根据交通密度的效果比较从Copula方法和DML获得的结果。在DML模型结构中,密度参数的标准误差项低于Copula方法,并且置信区间更可靠。另外,尽管效应的迹象相似,但由于混杂因素的虚假效果,副群方法估计流量密度低于DML的影响。简而言之,DML模型结构可以通过使用机器学习算法灵活地调整混杂因素的影响,并且更可靠地计划未来的政策。
Before the transition of AVs to urban roads and subsequently unprecedented changes in traffic conditions, evaluation of transportation policies and futuristic road design related to pedestrian crossing behavior is of vital importance. Recent studies analyzed the non-causal impact of various variables on pedestrian waiting time in the presence of AVs. However, we mainly investigate the causal effect of traffic density on pedestrian waiting time. We develop a Double/Debiased Machine Learning (DML) model in which the impact of confounders variable influencing both a policy and an outcome of interest is addressed, resulting in unbiased policy evaluation. Furthermore, we try to analyze the effect of traffic density by developing a copula-based joint model of two main components of pedestrian crossing behavior, pedestrian stress level and waiting time. The copula approach has been widely used in the literature, for addressing self-selection problems, which can be classified as a causality analysis in travel behavior modeling. The results obtained from copula approach and DML are compared based on the effect of traffic density. In DML model structure, the standard error term of density parameter is lower than copula approach and the confidence interval is considerably more reliable. In addition, despite the similar sign of effect, the copula approach estimates the effect of traffic density lower than DML, due to the spurious effect of confounders. In short, the DML model structure can flexibly adjust the impact of confounders by using machine learning algorithms and is more reliable for planning future policies.