论文标题

按需电动自动驾驶:路由和充电基础设施的联合优化

Electric Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand: Joint Optimization of Routing and Charging Infrastructure Siting

论文作者

Paparella, Fabio, Chauhan, Karni, Hofman, Theo, Salazar, Mauro

论文摘要

车辆自主权,连通性和电力总成的出现有望使自动驾驶在需求系统中的部署。至关重要的是,这些舰队的路由和充电活动受到单个车辆的设计和周围充电基础设施的影响,而基础设施又应设计为考虑预期的舰队运营。本文提出了一个建模和优化框架,我们通过放置基础架构来优化车队的活动。我们采用了介绍计划的观点,并根据路线和充电方式设计了一个时空的车队活动模型,通过将道路网络作为挖掘机重新采样,以使用ISO-Enerergy Arcs将道路网络重新采样,从而明确捕获了车辆的负责状态。然后,我们将问题作为混合企业线性程序抛弃,可确保全球最优性,并且可以在不到10分钟的时间内解决。最后,我们在纽约市曼哈顿展示了两个案例研究,其中包括现实世界中的出租车数据:第一个案例捕捉了收费基础设施流行与舰队驱动的空中赛之间的最佳权衡。我们观察到,共同优化基础设施的选址极大地超过了启发式策略,并且增加站点的数量仅在一定程度上是有益的。第二种情况的重点是车辆设计,并表明配备较小电池的车辆会导致最低的能源消耗:尽管需要更多到充电站的旅行,但与电池容量更大的车辆相比,此类机队所需的能量要少12%。

The advent of vehicle autonomy, connectivity and electric powertrains is expected to enable the deployment of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand systems. Crucially, the routing and charging activities of these fleets are impacted by the design of the individual vehicles and the surrounding charging infrastructure which, in turn, should be designed to account for the intended fleet operation. This paper presents a modeling and optimization framework where we optimize the activities of the fleet jointly with the placement of the charging infrastructure. We adopt a mesoscopic planning perspective and devise a time-invariant model of the fleet activities in terms of routes and charging patterns, explicitly capturing the state of charge of the vehicles by resampling the road network as a digraph with iso-energy arcs. Then, we cast the problem as a mixed-integer linear program that guarantees global optimality and can be solved in less than 10 min. Finally, we showcase two case studies with real-world taxi data in Manhattan, NYC: The first one captures the optimal trade-off between charging infrastructure prevalence and the empty-mileage driven by the fleet. We observe that jointly optimizing the infrastructure siting significantly outperforms heuristic placement policies, and that increasing the number of stations is beneficial only up to a certain point. The second case focuses on vehicle design and shows that deploying vehicles equipped with a smaller battery results in the lowest energy consumption: Although necessitating more trips to the charging stations, such fleets require about 12% less energy than the vehicles with a larger battery capacity.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源