学术文献库

The description of complex human mobility patterns is at the core of many important applications ranging from urbanism and transportation to epidemics containment. Data about collective human movements, once scarce, has become widely available thanks to new sources such as Phone CDR, GPS devices, or Smartphone apps. Nevertheless, it is still common to rely on a single dataset by implicitly assuming that it is a valid instance of universal dynamics, regardless of factors such as data gathering and processing techniques. Here, we test such an overarching assumption on an unprecedented scale by comparing human mobility datasets obtained from 7 different data-sources, tracing over 500 millions individuals in 145 countries. We report wide quantifiable differences in the resulting mobility networks and, in particular, in the displacement distribution previously thought to be universal. These variations -- that do not necessarily imply that the human mobility is not universal -- also impact processes taking place on these networks, as we show for the specific case of epidemic spreading. Our results point to the crucial need for disclosing the data processing and, overall, to follow good practices to ensure the robustness and the reproducibility of the results.