论文标题

双模式性触觉反馈通过虚拟EMG控制的抓手提高灵巧的任务执行

Dual-Modality Haptic Feedback Improves Dexterous Task Execution with Virtual EMG-Controlled Gripper

论文作者

Li, Kezi, Brown, Jeremy D.

论文摘要

使用肌发假体的高级截肢者目前缺乏进行日常生活的灵活活动所需的触觉感官信息。尽管大量研究重点是恢复这些触觉信息,但这些方法通常依赖于单模式反馈方案,这些反馈方案是必要的,但不足以用于中枢神经系统采用的饲料和反馈控制策略。多模式反馈方法一直在几个应用领域中引起人们的注意,但是,肌电假体的实用性尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们通过脆性对象和可变的负载力调查了双模式触觉反馈的效用。我们招募了n = 20个非注射者参与者在四个条件下执行任务:无反馈,振动起步的反馈,握持力的反馈以及双(振动 +挤压)的反馈反馈和抓地力的反馈。结果表明,接收任何反馈胜于任何反馈,都要好,但是,即使在开始滑动后,双模式反馈也远远优于任何一种单模式反馈方法。用双模式反馈的控制也比任何一种单模式反馈方法都更直观。

Upper-extremity amputees who use myoelectric prostheses currently lack the haptic sensory information needed to perform dexterous activities of daily living. While considerable research has focused on restoring this haptic information, these approaches often rely on single-modality feedback schemes which are necessary but insufficient for the feedforward and feedback control strategies employed by the central nervous system. Multi-modality feedback approaches have been gaining attention in several application domains, however, the utility for myoelectric prosthesis use remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the utility of dual-modality haptic feedback in a virtual EMG-controlled grasp-and-hold task with a brittle object and variable load force. We recruited N=20 non-amputee participants to perform the task in four conditions: no feedback, vibration feedback of incipient slip, squeezing feedback of grip force, and dual (vibration + squeezing) feedback of incipient slip and grip force. Results suggest that receiving any feedback is better than receiving none, however, dual-modality feedback is far superior to either single-modality feedback approach in terms of preventing the object from breaking or dropping, even after it started slipping. Control with dual-modality feedback was also seen as more intuitive than with either of the single-modality feedback approaches.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源