论文标题
在民族方法学,对话分析和人工智能之间导航不可通信
Navigating Incommensurability Between Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis, and Artificial Intelligence
论文作者
论文摘要
像许多研究社区一样,民族方法论家和对话分析师已经开始陷入 - 又一次 - 在人工智能(AI)激增的普遍景象中。受到越来越多的民族方法学研究人员(EM)和对话分析(CA)传统的讨论的启发,我开始思考EM和EM终结对话分析可能在AI研究领域所做的事情,甚至在对话分析的领域。因此,这篇文章是关于可能遇到的纪律和概念性问题,我认为 - 可能需要解决与AI研究及其分支机构的互动。尽管我主要关注要注意的事情以及彻底的危险,但后来我们可以考虑一些机会。在整个过程中,我将继续使用“我们”来谈论EM&CA研究人员;但这确实是为了方便的 - 我不想为我们复杂的研究社区进行口语。以下所有内容都应从我的特定研究历史,角度等中释放出来,并(希望)作为邀请EM和CA研究人员在转向技术和AI方面进行进一步讨论的邀请。
Like many research communities, ethnomethodologists and conversation analysts have begun to get caught up -- yet again -- in the pervasive spectacle of surging interests in Artificial Intelligence (AI). Inspired by discussions amongst a growing network of researchers in ethnomethodology (EM) and conversation analysis (CA) traditions who nurse such interests, I started thinking about what things EM and the more EM end of conversation analysis might be doing about, for, or even with, fields of AI research. So, this piece is about the disciplinary and conceptual questions that might be encountered, and -- in my view -- may need addressing for engagements with AI research and its affiliates. Although I'm mostly concerned with things to be aware of as well as outright dangers, later on we can think about some opportunities. And throughout I will keep using 'we' to talk about EM&CA researchers; but this really is for convenience only -- I don't wish to ventriloquise for our complex research communities. All of the following should be read as emanating from my particular research history, standpoint etc., and treated (hopefully) as an invitation for further discussion amongst EM and CA researchers turning to technology and AI specifically.