论文标题
评论“超流体氦气4之间的大规模模型之间的关系” [物理学。流体33，127124（2021]”
Comment on "On the relations between large-scale models of superfluid helium-4" [Phys. Fluids 33, 127124 (2021]"
论文作者
论文摘要
我们对M.Sýkora，M。Pavelka，M。LaMantia，D。Jou和M. Grmela的论文发表评论，“关于超级流体氦4的大型模型之间的关系”，Fluids的物理学，33（12）：127124（2021），作者为形式上形式上介绍了一个用于介绍Choodern offluy supperfluid of Superfluid of Supperfluid of Supperfluid of Supperfluid的形式。这种形式主义极大地基于Hall-Vinen-Bekarevich-Khalatnikov（HVBK）模型。我们强烈不同意在三维量子湍流的情况下使用HVBK方程方法，并在此评论中暴露了我们的异议。我们讨论了HVBK方法，还批评了所谓的涡旋束模型，该模型是在三维量子湍流中使用HVBK方法的基础。
We comment on the paper by M. Sýkora, M. Pavelka, M. La Mantia, D. Jou, and M. Grmela "On the relations between large-scale models of superfluid helium-4," Physics of Fluids, 33(12):127124(2021), where the authors have developed a formalism for describing a coarse-grained flow of superfluid helium. This formalism is greatly based on the Hall-Vinen-Bekarevich-Khalatnikov (HVBK) model. We strongly disagree with the use of the HVBK equation approach for the case of the three-dimensional quantum turbulence and expose our objections in this comment. We discuss the HVBK method and also criticize the so-called vortex bundles model, which serves as a basis for using the HVBK method in a three-dimensional quantum turbulence.
