论文标题
印度的平权行动政策的宪法实施
Constitutional Implementation of Affirmative Action Policies in India
论文作者
论文摘要
印度是一项全面的地肯定行动计划的所在地，该计划保留在政府机构为各个不利组织的一小部分职位。尽管在所有职位相同的情况下，都有最高法院认可的机制来执行这些保留政策，但当职位是异质的时，法院避免认可明确的机制。这种空白导致广泛采用违宪机制，无数诉讼和法院裁决不一致。在地标最高法院判决索拉夫·亚达夫（Saurav Yadav）（2020）中为技术公理制定命令，我们表明2SMH-DA机制非常适合克服这些挑战。
India is home to a comprehensive affirmative action program that reserves a fraction of positions at governmental institutions for various disadvantaged groups. While there is a Supreme Court-endorsed mechanism to implement these reservation policies when all positions are identical, courts have refrained from endorsing explicit mechanisms when positions are heterogeneous. This lacunae has resulted in widespread adoption of unconstitutional mechanisms, countless lawsuits, and inconsistent court rulings. Formulating mandates in the landmark Supreme Court judgment Saurav Yadav (2020) as technical axioms, we show that the 2SMH-DA mechanism is uniquely suited to overcome these challenges.
