论文标题

对LSND和MINIBOONE多余的常见解决方案的要求:麦片后研究

Requirements on common solutions to the LSND and MiniBooNE excesses: a post-MicroBooNE study

论文作者

Abdallah, Waleed, Gandhi, Raj, Roy, Samiran

论文摘要

当液体闪烁体中微子检测器(LSND)与最近的微生物结果一起解释,在液体闪烁体中微子检测器(LSND)中,观察到的电子样事件过量的强大统计显着性以及早期在液体闪烁剂中微子检测器(LSND)中的过量显着性具有强大的统计学意义。这导致了许多尝试通过标准模型(SM)的物理学单独和结合的每个实验来理解这些观察结果的许多尝试。我们提供了当前情况的概述,并讨论了三个主要类别,其中许多关于新物理学的建议下降。相同的非振荡物理学解释了异常的可能性导致了新的限制和要求。我们在这项工作中重点关注的重要类别由探测器中产生的沉重$ {\ cal o} $(mev $ - $ sub-gev)无菌中性效率(通过(通过向后散射),随后腐烂到光子或$ e^+e^+e^+$ pears,以下是衰减的。此类解决方案受到a)横截面要求的强烈要求,这些要求将在LSND和MB中产生足够数量的总事件,b)在两个实验中测得的能量和角度分布施加的要求,最后,c)新物理模型的一致性和兼容性及其粒子含量及其粒子与粒子物理学实验粒子不同的粒子含量。我们发现,这些标准通常将提出的解决方案沿不同的方向提取,并严格限制了可以解决这两个异常情况的可行建议集。我们的结论与对新物理学的一般搜索以及微酮实验的持续观察和分析有关。

The strong statistical significance of an observed electron-like event excess in the MiniBooNE (MB) experiment, along with an earlier similar excess seen in the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND), when interpreted in conjunction with recent MicroBooNE results may have brought us to the cusp of new physics discoveries. This has led to many attempts to understand these observations, both for each experiment individually and in conjunction, via physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). We provide an overview of the current situation, and discuss three major categories under which the many proposals for new physics fall. The possibility that the same new, non-oscillation physics explains both anomalies leads to new restrictions and requirements. An important class of such common solutions, which we focus on in this work, consists of a heavy ${\cal O}$(MeV$-$sub-GeV) sterile neutral fermion produced in the detectors, (via up-scattering of the incoming muon neutrinos), and subsequently decaying to photons or $e^+e^-$ pairs which mimic the observed signals. Such solutions are subject to strong demands from a) cross section requirements which would yield a sufficient number of total events in both LSND and MB, b) requirements imposed by the measured energy and angular distributions in both experiments and finally, c) consistency and compatibility of the new physics model and its particle content with other bounds from a diverse swathe of particle physics experiments. We find that these criteria often pull proposed solutions in different directions, and stringently limit the viable set of proposals which could resolve both anomalies. Our conclusions are relevant for both the general search for new physics and for the ongoing observations and analyses of the MicroBooNE experiment.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源