论文标题
开放访问方式对通过现场和时间效果控制混合期刊的影响的影响
Contribution of the Open Access modality to the impact of hybrid journals controlling by field and time effects
论文作者
论文摘要
研究人员比无法获得的论文更有可能阅读和引用他们所拥有的论文。因此，这项工作的目的是分析开放获取方式（OA）对混合期刊影响的贡献。为此，分析了2017年在四个主题领域的200个混合期刊中的研究文章，并分析了此类文章在Scopus数据库中收到的引用。这些期刊是从OA论文份额高于某些最低价值的份额中随机选择的。在样本中分析了超过6.0万篇研究文章，其中OA模式下的24％。结果，我们在两种混合方式中都获得了这一引用，这两种混合方式都非常相关。但是，在任何混合方式中，OA患病率与每篇文章的引用之间没有相关性。 80％的混合期刊具有OA引文优势。此外，OA引文优势在整个领域都保持一致并及时保持。我们平均获得50％的OA引文优势，一半的混合杂志中有超过37％。最后，人文科学中的OA引文优势比科学和社会科学更高。
Researchers are more likely to read and cite papers to which they have access than those that they cannot obtain. Thus, the objective of this work is to analyze the contribution of the Open Access (OA) modality to the impact of hybrid journals. For this, the research articles in the year 2017 from 200 hybrid journals in four subject areas, and the citations received by such articles in the period 2017-2020 in the Scopus database, were analyzed. The journals were randomly selected from those with share of OA papers higher than some minimal value. More than 60 thousand research articles were analyzed in the sample, of which 24% under the OA modality. As results, we obtain that cites per article in both hybrid modalities strongly correlate. However, there is no correlation between the OA prevalence and cites per article in any of the hybrid modalities. There is OA citation advantage in 80% of hybrid journals. Moreover, the OA citation advantage is consistent across fields and held in time. We obtain an OA citation advantage of 50% in average, and higher than 37% in half of the hybrid journals. Finally, the OA citation advantage is higher in Humanities than in Science and Social Science.
