论文标题
Born的统治是贝叶斯连贯性的量子扩展
Born's rule as a quantum extension of Bayesian coherence
论文作者
论文摘要
主观的贝叶斯对概率的解释断言,概率的概率规则遵循荷兰书籍连贯性的规范原则:决策代理人不应分配概率,以便基于这些概率的一系列货币交易会导致他们期望肯定损失。同样,主观的贝叶斯对量子力学(QBISM)的解释断言,天生的规则是类似于荷兰书籍连贯性的规范规则,但是添加了一个或多个基于经验的假设,即将量子理论连接到物理世界的特定特征。在这里,我们将此链接显式,以猜测出生规则的猜想表示,如果每个有限的维度希尔伯特空间都存在对称信息完整的poVM(或SICS),则将其真实。我们证明,一个认为自己正在赌在足够类似量子的系统上的测量结果的经纪人,但在放置赌注时拒绝使用这种形式的规则。足够类似量子的关键属性是该系统接受对称参考测量值,但是该测量并不是对任何隐藏变量进行采样。
The subjective Bayesian interpretation of probability asserts that the rules of the probability calculus follow from the normative principle of Dutch-book coherence: A decision-making agent should not assign probabilities such that a series of monetary transactions based on those probabilities would lead them to expect a sure loss. Similarly, the subjective Bayesian interpretation of quantum mechanics (QBism) asserts that the Born rule is a normative rule in analogy to Dutch-book coherence, but with the addition of one or more empirically based assumptions -- i.e., the "only a little more" that connects quantum theory to the particular characteristics of the physical world. Here we make this link explicit for a conjectured representation of the Born rule which holds true if symmetric informationally complete POVMs (or SICs) exist for every finite dimensional Hilbert space. We prove that an agent who thinks they are gambling on the outcomes of measurements on a sufficiently quantum-like system, but refuses to use this form of the Born rule when placing their bets is vulnerable to a Dutch book. The key property for being sufficiently quantum-like is that the system admits a symmetric reference measurement, but that this measurement is not sampling any hidden variables.