论文标题
木星内部结构的基准测试状态氢方程
Benchmarking the ab initio hydrogen equations of state for the interior structure of Jupiter
论文作者
论文摘要
由于Juno目前正在测量木星的重力力矩,以使其前所未有的精度,因此将行星内部结构的模型放在测试中。尽管基于第一原理或从头算模拟的状态方程已经可用,并用于构成包膜,氢和氦气的两个最丰富的元素,但在木星内部结构的预测方面仍然存在很大的差异。这些差异足够严重,可以使朱诺数据的分析混乱,甚至对这些计算昂贵的EOSS的有用性表示怀疑,以建模木星和外部球队的内部。使用我们新开发的氢和氦状态状态方程,我们可以评估目前可用的状态的始于状态方程,并在两层模型中预测木星的内部结构,以确定其效率。通过调整我们的自由能参数化以重现先前的AB始于EOS的行为,我们确定了先前报道的木星内部结构的分歧来源。我们进一步指出,在为巨型行星建模时应注意时应注意的区域。这涉及从头开始结果与用于覆盖低密度范围的物理模型之间的插值以及{\ sl ab intibion}仿真结果在高密度下的插值。这种敏感性很好地属于从头开始模拟的不确定性。这表明,在解释Juno数据所需的更先进的行星模型中,应使用简单的行星模型对氢EO进行仔细测定。最终,我们提供了最近发布的Ab Initi氢EOS的更新版本。
As Juno is presently measuring Jupiter's gravitational moments to unprecedented accuracy, models for the interior structure of the planet are putted to the test. While equations of state based on first principles or ab initio simulations have been available and used for the two most abundant elements constituting the envelope, hydrogen and helium, significant discrepancies remain regarding the predictions of the inner structure of Jupiter. The differences are severe enough to clutter the analysis of Juno's data and even cast doubts on the usefulness of these computationally expensive EOSs for the modeling of the interior of Jupiter and exoplanets at large. Using our newly developed equations of state for hydrogen and helium, we asses the ab initio equations of state currently available and establish their efficiency at predicting the interior structure of Jupiter in a two-layers model. By adjusting our free energy parameterization to reproduce previous ab initio EOS behavior, we identify the source of the disagreement previously reported for the interior structure of Jupiter. We further point to area where care should be taken when building EOS for the modeling of giant planets. This concerns the interpolation between the ab initio results and the physical models used to cover the low density range as well as the interpolation of the {\sl ab initio} simulation results at high densities. This sensitivity falls well within the uncertainties of the ab initio simulations. This suggests that hydrogen EOS should be carefully benchmarked using a simple planetary model before being used in the more advanced planetary models needed to interpret the Juno data. We finally provide an updated version of our ab initio hydrogen EOS recently published.