论文标题

探测异常的正电子分数起源,具有完全缓慢的衰减gravitino暗物质候选者

Probing the anomalous positron fraction origin with fully leptonic decaying gravitino dark matter candidates

论文作者

Buchner, Johannes, Carquin, Edson, Díaz, Marco A., Gómez-Vargas, Germán A., Panes, Boris, Viaux, Nicolás

论文摘要

与标准的天体物理源的预期相比,通过太空实验Pamela,AMS-02,Calet,Dampe和Fermi-Lat测得的电子和正电子宇宙射线的通量显示出高能的意外行为。特别是,AMS-02观察结果为新来源的正上音和电子的来源提供了令人信服的证据,其起源仍然未知。合理的场景包括暗物质的贡献或未解决的天体物理来源,例如附近的脉冲星。已经表明,主要基于暗物质的解释倾向于过量生产伽马射线,与半乳酸外伽玛射线背景(EGB)的测量发生冲突。尽管这种情况似乎很通用,但最终取决于暗物质候选者的特性。在这项工作中,我们重新审视了一个模型,其中Gravitino是一种暗物质候选者,它通过违反耦合的R-Parity腐烂到SM颗粒。我们表明,与双线性耦合允许的通道相比,三线耦合允许的衰减通道产生更多的电子和正电子和更少的光子。实际上,仅考虑AMS-02数据时,我们发现三连线模型与EGB约束兼容。但是,当考虑到电子和正电子通量之和的潮湿或磁盘测量值而不是AMS-02数据时,该结果可能会发生变化。因此,为了进一步评估此模型,需要阐明这些实验收集的数据之间的差异

The flux of electron and positron cosmic rays measured by the space-based experiments PAMELA, AMS-02, CALET, DAMPE and Fermi-LAT shows an unexpected behaviour at high energies, in comparison with expectations from standard astrophysical sources. In particular, AMS-02 observations provide compelling evidence for a new source of positrons and electrons whose origin is still unknown. Plausible scenarios include either the contribution of dark matter or unresolved astrophysical sources, such as nearby pulsars. It has been shown that explanations based mostly on dark matter, tend to overproduce gamma-rays, entering in conflict with measurements of the extra-galactic gamma-ray background (EGB). Although this situation seems to be quite generic, it ultimately depends on the properties of the dark matter candidate. In this work we revisit a model in which the gravitino is a dark matter candidate decaying to SM particles through R-parity violating couplings. We show that decay channels allowed by trilinear couplings produce more electrons and positrons and fewer photons in comparison to channels allowed by bilinear couplings. Indeed, when considering AMS-02 data alone we find that the trilinear model is compatible with EGB constraints. However, this result may change when DAMPE or CALET measurements of the sum of electrons and positrons fluxes are considered instead of AMS-02 data. Therefore, in order to evaluate this model further, discrepancies between the data collected by these experiments need to be clarified

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源