论文标题
PM2.5和全因死亡率
PM2.5 and all-cause mortality
论文作者
论文摘要
美国EPA和谁声称PM2.5是全因死亡的因果。支持和资助有关空气质量和健康影响的研究。他资助了关于空气质量和健康效应论文的大规模系统评价和荟萃分析。审查了1,632篇文献论文，并为荟萃分析选择了196条。选择标准的空气成分，颗粒物，PM10和PM2.5，二氧化氮，NO2和臭氧作为原因，并将其作为结果选择作为结果。提出了PM2.5和全因死亡的索赔，风险比为1.0065，置信度限制为1.0044至1.0086。有必要评估该因果要求的可靠性。基于P值图和对几种偏见形式的讨论，我们得出结论，该关联不是因果关系。
The US EPA and the WHO claim that PM2.5 is causal of all-cause deaths. Both support and fund research on air quality and health effects. WHO funded a massive systematic review and meta-analyses of air quality and health-effect papers. 1,632 literature papers were reviewed and 196 were selected for meta-analyses. The standard air components, particulate matter, PM10 and PM2.5, nitrogen dioxide, NO2, and ozone, were selected as causes and all-cause and cause-specific mortalities were selected as outcomes. A claim was made for PM2.5 and all-cause deaths, risk ratio of 1.0065, with confidence limits of 1.0044 to 1.0086. There is a need to evaluate the reliability of this causal claim. Based on a p-value plot and discussion of several forms of bias, we conclude that the association is not causal.
