论文标题

AI皮肤病变分析的进展

AI Progress in Skin Lesion Analysis

论文作者

Burlina, Philippe M., Paul, William, Mathew, Phil A., Joshi, Neil J., Rebman, Alison W., Aucott, John N.

论文摘要

我们研究了使用AI来检测皮肤病变的进展,并特别强调了急性莱姆病的红斑偏头发,以及其他病变,例如来自疱疹带状疱疹(带状疱疹),Tinea Corporis,Merythema Corporis,Merythema Multonforce,Multormore,Multormore,Colulululiso,纤维素炎,昆虫,昆虫咬伤的疾病。我们讨论了这些应用的重要挑战,尤其是关于黑皮肤个体缺乏皮肤图像的AI偏差问题,能够与图像中的正常皮肤相比,能够准确地检测,描述和细分病变或感兴趣的区域或感兴趣的区域,以及较低的射击学习(解决训练图像的分类))。解决这些问题的范围从非常可取的要求 - 例如对于描述,这对于在类似类型的病变之间歧义并进行了改进的诊断可能是有用的 - 或者像AI偏差一样所需的情况,以便在诊所内部署公平AI技术以进行皮肤病变分析。 For the problem of low shot learning in particular, we report skin analysis algorithms that gracefully degrade and still perform well at low shots, when compared to baseline algorithms: when using a little as 10 training exemplars per class, the baseline DL algorithm performance significantly degrades, with accuracy of 56.41%, close to chance, whereas the best performing low shot algorithm yields an accuracy of 85.26%.

We examine progress in the use of AI for detecting skin lesions, with particular emphasis on the erythema migrans rash of acute Lyme disease, and other lesions, such as those from conditions like herpes zoster (shingles), tinea corporis, erythema multiforme, cellulitis, insect bites, or tick bites. We discuss important challenges for these applications, in particular the problems of AI bias regarding the lack of skin images in dark skinned individuals, being able to accurately detect, delineate, and segment lesions or regions of interest compared to normal skin in images, and low shot learning (addressing classification with a paucity of training images). Solving these problems ranges from being highly desirable requirements -- e.g. for delineation, which may be useful to disambiguate between similar types of lesions, and perform improved diagnostics -- or required, as is the case for AI de-biasing, to allow for the deployment of fair AI techniques in the clinic for skin lesion analysis. For the problem of low shot learning in particular, we report skin analysis algorithms that gracefully degrade and still perform well at low shots, when compared to baseline algorithms: when using a little as 10 training exemplars per class, the baseline DL algorithm performance significantly degrades, with accuracy of 56.41%, close to chance, whereas the best performing low shot algorithm yields an accuracy of 85.26%.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源