论文标题

尘埃质量确定中的系统错误:实验室不透明度测量的见解

Systematic errors in dust mass determinations: Insights from laboratory opacity measurements

论文作者

Fanciullo, Lapo, Kemper, Francisca, Scicluna, Peter, Dharmawardena, Thavisha E., Srinivasan, Sundar

论文摘要

灰尘的热发射是星际介质中最重要的示踪剂之一:远红外(FIR)和亚毫米(submm)中的多波长光度法可以安装模型,从而提供了尘埃质量的估计。拟合结果取决于FIR/submm不透明度的假定值,在大多数模型中,由于稀缺,直到最近的实验测量值 - 从较短的波长中推断出来。但是,尘埃类似物的实验室测量表明,FIR的不透光率通常高于模型中使用的值并取决于温度,这表明尘埃质量估计值可能是偏差的。为了测试这种偏见的程度,我们使用FIR/Combsm Dust不透明度的实验结果为不同温度和红移在不同温度和红移下为灰尘星系创建多波长的合成光度法,然后使用标准灰尘模型拟合合成数据。我们发现,通过典型模型回收的尘埃质量被因子2到20高估了,具体取决于如何处理实验性不相处。因此,如果实验性灰尘样品是星际尘埃的准确类似物,则目前的尘埃质量被高估了20个因子20。讨论了我们对银河系和高红移的理解的影响。

The thermal emission of dust is one of the most important tracers of the interstellar medium: multi-wavelength photometry in the far-infrared (FIR) and submillimeter (submm) can be fitted with a model, providing estimates of the dust mass. The fit results depend on the assumed value for FIR/submm opacity, which in most models - due to the scarcity, until recently, of experimental measurements - is extrapolated from shorter wavelengths. Lab measurements of dust analogues, however, show that FIR opacities are usually higher than the values used in models and depend on temperature, which suggests that dust mass estimates may be biased. To test the extent of this bias, we create multi-wavelength synthetic photometry for dusty galaxies at different temperatures and redshifts, using experimental results for FIR/submm dust opacity, then we fit the synthetic data using standard dust models. We find that the dust masses recovered by typical models are overestimated by a factor 2 to 20, depending on how the experimental opacities are treated. If the experimental dust samples are accurate analogues of interstellar dust, therefore, current dust masses are overestimated by up to a factor 20. The implications for our understanding of dust, both Galactic and at high redshift, are discussed.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源