论文标题

一种简单而有效的动力学模型,用于储蓄倾向效果:基于晶格自动机

A simple and efficient kinetic model for wealth distribution with saving propensity effect: based on lattice gas automaton

论文作者

Cui, Lijie, Lin, Chuandong

论文摘要

财富分配的动态在经济市场中起着至关重要的作用,因此对其非平衡统计力学的理解对人类社会至关重要。为此,提出了一个简单有效的一维(1D)晶格自动机(LGA),用于具有或不保存倾向的代理的财富分布。 LGA包括两个阶段,即随机传播和经济交易。在以前的阶段,代理要么保持一动不动,要么以一定的概率行进到其相邻的空位置之一。在随后的程序中,随机进行一对邻近代理商之间进行经济交易。它需要至少4个邻居才能提供正确的模拟结果。如果所有代理人都是邻居并且不存在空地,则LGA将仅通过随机经济交易减少到最简单的模型。比2D-LGA和著名的Chakraborti-Chakrabarti经济模型具有更高的计算效率。最后,LGA通过两个基准进行了验证,即单个代理商和双收入家庭的财富分布。随着储蓄分数的增加,Gini系数和加尔各答指数(对于单个代理或两年型家族)都会降低,而偏差度(定义为衡量具有和不保存增强性的概率分布之间的差异)增加。已经证明,通过减轻财富不平等的储蓄倾向,财富分配发生了重大改变。

The dynamics of wealth distribution plays a critical role in the economic market, hence an understanding of its nonequilibrium statistical mechanics is of great importance to human society. For this aim, a simple and efficient one-dimensional (1D) lattice gas automaton (LGA) is presented for wealth distribution of agents with or without saving propensity. The LGA comprises two stages, i.e., random propagation and economic transaction. During the former phase, an agent either remains motionless or travels to one of its neighboring empty sites with a certain probability. In the subsequent procedure, an economic transaction takes place between a pair of neighboring agents randomly. It requires at least 4 neighbors to present correct simulation results. The LGA reduces to the simplest model with only random economic transaction if all agents are neighbors and no empty sites exist. The 1D-LGA has a higher computational efficiency than the 2D-LGA and the famous Chakraborti-Chakrabarti economic model. Finally, the LGA is validated with two benchmarks, i.e., the wealth distributions of individual agents and dual-earner families. With the increasing saving fraction, both the Gini coefficient and Kolkata index (for individual agents or two-earner families) reduce, while the deviation degree (defined to measure the difference between the probability distributions with and without saving propensities) increases. It is demonstrated that the wealth distribution is changed significantly by the saving propensity which alleviates wealth inequality.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源