论文标题

基于潜在图的条形分类

Bar Classification based on the Potential Map

论文作者

Lee, Yun Hee, Park, Myeong-Gu, Ann, Hong Bae, Kim, Taehyun, Seo, Woo-Young

论文摘要

我们介绍了一种新方法,以将禁止的星系进行分类,该方法利用了横向对辐射力比率图(比率图,以下几图)与以前的研究不同。当我们在极坐标中显示比率图时,禁止的星系显示为四个对齐的水平厚板。这种特征功能使我们能够以87%的准确性成功地对被禁止和非限制的星系进行分类。当Sloan Digital Sky Survey/dr7附近的884个螺旋星系(Z <0.01)螺旋星系时,它的条形分数为53%,包括SB和SABS。它还提供了条形的强度和长度测量,尤其是与螺旋臂分开的。它们与椭圆拟合和傅立叶分析所估计的措施显示出良好的相关性。但是,我们发现,在哈勃序列方面,棒强度测量的趋势不同:随着哈勃序列的增加(朝着晚期),条强度和条形椭圆率的增加,而偶极傅立叶振幅降低。我们表明,根据分类方法,凸起对条形强度的估计有所不同。凸起导致条形长度在所有三种方法中被高估。同时,我们发现禁止的星系显示了角度平均力比的两种类型的径向轮廓:一个具有最大峰(M型),另一个具有高原(P型)。与数值模拟的比较表明,在进化阶段,M型条比P型杆更成熟。

We introduce a new approach to classify barred galaxies that utilizes the transverse-to-radial force ratio map (ratio map, hereafter) in a different manner from previous studies. When we display the ratio map in polar coordinates, barred galaxies appear as four aligned, horizontal thick slabs. This characteristic feature enables us to successfully classify barred and nonbarred galaxies with an accuracy of 87%. It yields the bar fraction of 53%, including both SBs and SABs, when applied to 884 nearby (z < 0.01) spiral galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey/DR7. It also provides the bar strength and length measurements, in particular, separated from the spiral arms. They show good correlations with the measures estimated from ellipse fitting and Fourier analysis. However, we find different tendencies of the bar strength measurements in terms of the Hubble sequence: as the Hubble sequence increases (towards late-type), the bar strength and bar ellipticity increase, whereas the dipole Fourier amplitude decreases. We show that the bulge affects the estimation of the bar strength differently, depending on the classification methods. The bulge causes the bar length to be overestimated in all three methods. Meanwhile, we find that barred galaxies show two types of radial profiles of the angle-averaged force ratio: one has a maximum peak (type M) and the other a plateau (type P). Comparison with numerical simulations suggests that type M bars are more mature than type P bars in terms of evolutionary stage.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源