论文标题
具有不相交源和接收器的非线性双曲线方程的逆问题
Inverse problems for non-linear hyperbolic equations with disjoint sources and receivers
论文作者
论文摘要
论文研究在各种半线性和准线性波方程中确定未知系数的反问题。我们引入了一种使用三个波的相互作用来解决非线性方程的反问题的方法,这使得可以在所有维度$ n+1 \ geq 3 $中研究逆问题。我们考虑了支持源的$ω_ {\ textrm {in}} $的情况,并在其中支撑源,以及设置$ω_ {\ textrm {out}} $进行观察的情况下,分开了观测。作为模型问题,我们研究了准线性和半线性波方程,并且在每种情况下都表明,可以唯一地将背景度量恢复到自然障碍物的唯一性,这是由波动方程的有限传播速度和对应于坐标变化的量表所控制的。证明由两个独立组成部分组成。在上半年,我们研究了高斯梁实际部分附近的非线性波方程的多折线性化,从而导致三波相互作用。我们表明,三波相互作用可以产生三对一的散射数据。在本文的后半部分,我们研究了三对一散射关系的抽象表述,表明它在因果钻石集中恢复了歧管的拓扑,差异和保形结构,这是点$ p_ {inω__________________________的$ p_ {in} $ point $ p_ { ω_ {\ textrm {out}} $。结果不需要在共轭或切割点上任何假设。
The paper studies inverse problems of determining unknown coefficients in various semi-linear and quasi-linear wave equations. We introduce a method to solve inverse problems for non-linear equations using interaction of three waves, that makes it possible to study the inverse problem in all dimensions $n+1\geq 3$. We consider the case when the set $Ω_{\textrm{in}}$, where the sources are supported, and the set $Ω_{\textrm{out}}$, where the observations are made, are separated. As model problems we study both a quasi-linear and also a semi-linear wave equation and show in each case that it is possible to uniquely recover the background metric up to the natural obstructions for uniqueness that is governed by finite speed of propagation for the wave equation and a gauge corresponding to change of coordinates. The proof consists of two independent components. In the first half we study multiple-fold linearization of the non-linear wave equation near real parts of Gaussian beams that results in a three-wave interaction. We show that the three-wave interaction can produce a three-to-one scattering data. In the second half of the paper, we study an abstract formulation of the three-to-one scattering relation showing that it recovers the topological, differential and conformal structures of the manifold in a causal diamond set that is the intersection of the future of the point $p_{in}\in Ω_{\textrm{in}}$ and the past of the point $p_{out}\in Ω_{\textrm{out}}$. The results do not require any assumptions on the conjugate or cut points.