论文标题
通过大数据火花平台通过无对齐的基因组分析
Alignment-free Genomic Analysis via a Big Data Spark Platform
论文作者
论文摘要
动机:无对准的距离和相似性函数(简称AF函数)是许多基因组,元基因组和表观基因组任务的两个和多个序列比对的良好替代方案。由于数据密集型应用程序,AF函数的计算是一个大数据问题,最近的文献表明,快速,可扩展算法计算AF函数的开发是一项高优先级任务。令人惊讶的是,尽管大数据技术在计算生物学中的普及程度越来越高,但可能由于其复杂性而没有追求这些任务的大数据平台的开发。结果:我们通过引入Fade来填补这一重要空白,这是第一个可扩展,高效且可扩展的火花平台,用于无对齐的基因组分析。它支持了最近的Hallmark基准研究研究中出现的最佳性能AF功能。淡出的发展和潜在影响包括感兴趣的新方面。也就是说,(a)分布式算法的大量努力,最明显的结果是执行时间更快的参考方法(例如MASH和FSWM); (b)一种软件设计,可通过Spark非专家淡出淡出的用户友好且易于扩展; (c)其支持数据和计算密集型任务的能力。关于这一点,就其产出的统计意义而言,我们提供了一种新颖且急需的分析AF功能。我们的发现自然扩展了备受推崇的基准研究的研究,因为可以真正使用的功能降低到淡出中的18个功能中的少数。
Motivation: Alignment-free distance and similarity functions (AF functions, for short) are a well established alternative to two and multiple sequence alignments for many genomic, metagenomic and epigenomic tasks. Due to data-intensive applications, the computation of AF functions is a Big Data problem, with the recent Literature indicating that the development of fast and scalable algorithms computing AF functions is a high-priority task. Somewhat surprisingly, despite the increasing popularity of Big Data technologies in Computational Biology, the development of a Big Data platform for those tasks has not been pursued, possibly due to its complexity. Results: We fill this important gap by introducing FADE, the first extensible, efficient and scalable Spark platform for Alignment-free genomic analysis. It supports natively eighteen of the best performing AF functions coming out of a recent hallmark benchmarking study. FADE development and potential impact comprises novel aspects of interest. Namely, (a) a considerable effort of distributed algorithms, the most tangible result being a much faster execution time of reference methods like MASH and FSWM; (b) a software design that makes FADE user-friendly and easily extendable by Spark non-specialists; (c) its ability to support data- and compute-intensive tasks. About this, we provide a novel and much needed analysis of how informative and robust AF functions are, in terms of the statistical significance of their output. Our findings naturally extend the ones of the highly regarded benchmarking study, since the functions that can really be used are reduced to a handful of the eighteen included in FADE.