论文标题
在考试中使用单词进行计算以进行学生策略评估
Computing With Words for Student Strategy Evaluation in an Examination
论文作者
论文摘要
在颗粒计算(GC)的框架中,间隔2型模糊集(IT2 FSS)通过促进更好地表示不确定的语言信息,从而发挥着重要作用。感知计算(每C),一种具有单词(CWW)方法的众所周知的计算,其各种应用都很好地利用了这一优势。本文报告了针对学生策略评估的基于C的新颖方法。通常将考试面向测试学生的学科知识。他们能够准确地解决考试中学生的成功率的问题数量。但是,我们认为不仅问题的解决方案,而且还采用了找到这些解决方案的策略。与学生相比,他的策略相对不好。此外,可以将学生策略视为衡量教职员工所感知的学习成果的衡量标准。这可以帮助识别学生的学习成果不好的学生,因此可以为任何相关的帮助提供改进。本文的主要贡献是说明使用CWW进行学生策略评估,并比较不同CWW方法产生的建议。 CWW为我们提供了两个主要优势。首先,它为学生在考试中采用的策略的总体评估产生了数字评分。这可以根据他们的表现进行比较和排名。其次,还从系统中获得了描述学生策略的语言评估。这些数字分数和语言建议都可以一起评估学生策略的质量。我们发现,Per-C在所有情况下都会产生独特的建议,并且胜过其他CWW方法。
In the framework of Granular Computing (GC), Interval type 2 Fuzzy Sets (IT2 FSs) play a prominent role by facilitating a better representation of uncertain linguistic information. Perceptual Computing (Per C), a well known computing with words (CWW) approach, and its various applications have nicely exploited this advantage. This paper reports a novel Per C based approach for student strategy evaluation. Examinations are generally oriented to test the subject knowledge of students. The number of questions that they are able to solve accurately judges success rates of students in the examinations. However, we feel that not only the solutions of questions, but also the strategy adopted for finding those solutions are equally important. More marks should be awarded to a student, who solves a question with a better strategy compared to a student, whose strategy is relatively not that good. Furthermore, the students strategy can be taken as a measure of his or her learning outcome as perceived by a faculty member. This can help to identify students, whose learning outcomes are not good, and, thus, can be provided with any relevant help, for improvement. The main contribution of this paper is to illustrate the use of CWW for student strategy evaluation and present a comparison of the recommendations generated by different CWW approaches. CWW provides us with two major advantages. First, it generates a numeric score for the overall evaluation of strategy adopted by a student in the examination. This enables comparison and ranking of the students based on their performances. Second, a linguistic evaluation describing the student strategy is also obtained from the system. Both these numeric score and linguistic recommendation are together used to assess the quality of a students strategy. We found that Per-C generates unique recommendations in all cases and outperforms other CWW approaches.