论文标题
为多个患者分开一个呼吸机 - 技术评估
Splitting one ventilator for multiple patients -- a technical assessment
论文作者
论文摘要
由于最近的冠状病毒爆发,许多努力和创新的解决方案已经浮出水面,以应对患者灾难性潮流中可能缺乏呼吸机的短缺。一种解决方案涉及将一个呼吸机分割以治疗多个患者,并且原则上很容易实施,但是存在明显的风险,而对于该技术如何适用于Covid-19的ARDS患者,知之甚少。先前的研究表明,可以从一台机器中成功通风的多个具有相等特征的测试肺,但是当连接具有不同依从性的肺时,潮汐体积递送的差异很大。为了讨论该技术的可行性,进行了技术评估,包括使用两种类型的测试肺,不同的呼吸机环境和测试肺特征对先前研究进行扩展的实验。使用两个测试肺连接到呼吸机,测量了两种肺部的潮汐体积和压力,用于不同的肺合规性,气道阻力,通风模式,灵感和呼吸压力水平。我们发现,成对的测试肺与合规性差异成正比的潮汐体积的差异,对气道电阻的差异很小的影响,并且在体积控制模式下,只有一个测试肺的依从性变化也会改变传递给另一个测试肺的潮汐体积。对于一种测试肺类型,我们还发现,较高的窥视设置可以强烈影响测试肺之间的潮汐体积平衡。从这项研究和技术的角度来看,我们无法确定可靠的设置,调整或任何简单的措施来克服这种简单技术的危害,并且为缓解风险提供了更高级的解决方案。
Due to the recent coronavirus outbreak, many efforts and innovative solutions have surfaced to deal with the possible shortage of ventilators upon catastrophic surges of patients. One solution involves splitting one ventilator to treat multiple patients and is in principle easy to implement, but there are obvious risks, and little is known on how the technique would work on patients with ARDS from Covid-19. Previous studies have shown that multiple test lungs of equal characteristics can be successfully ventilated from one machine, but that large variations in tidal volume delivery occurs when lungs with different compliance are connected. In contribution to the discussion of the feasibility of the technique, a technical assessment was done including experiments expanding on the previous studies using two types of test lungs, different ventilator settings and test lung characteristics. Using two test lungs connected to a ventilator, the tidal volumes and pressures into both lungs were measured for different combinations of lung compliance, airway resistances, modes of ventilation, inspiratory and end-expiratory pressure levels. We found discrepancies in delivered tidal volumes for paired test lungs proportional with compliance differences, little influence from differences in airway resistances, and that changes in compliance of only one test lung would also change the tidal volume delivered to the other test lung when in volume controlled mode. For one of the test lung types, we also found that higher PEEP settings could strongly influence the tidal volume balance between the test lungs. From this study and from a technical point of view, we were not able to identify reliable settings, adjustments or any simple measures to overcome the hazards of this simple technique, and a more advanced solution is indicated for mitigating risks.