论文标题
MRI中3D几何失真表征的模块化幻影和软件
A modular phantom and software to characterize 3D geometric distortion in MRI
论文作者
论文摘要
MRI提供出色的软组织对比度,可减少目标和有机风险划定中的不确定性,并启用在线自适应图像引导的治疗。由于梯度场中的非线性和主磁场中的不均匀性,必须在成像视野视野中解释,以防止治疗递送过程中有系统的误差。这项工作提出了模块化的幻影和软件应用,以表征放射治疗模拟所需的大型视野MRI图像中的几何失真(GD)。模块化幻影是从一系列构造中包含高对比度基准标记的矩形泡沫块组装的。模块化幻影设计有助于在不同的MR扫描仪和MR引导线性加速器之间的幻影运输,并允许幻影适应以适合不同尺寸的孔或线圈。使用1.5T MR引导线性加速器(MR-LINAC)和1.5T和3.0T诊断扫描仪评估幻影。通过不同的采集参数来评估性能,以以已知方式诱导图像扭曲。使用具有2D和3D失真校正算法的T1和T2加权脉冲序列进行成像,接收器带宽(BW)变化为250-815 Hz/Pixel。跨独立设置评估了幻影设置的可重复性。通过与非模块化幻影进行比较来验证该软件。对于1.5 T扫描仪,MR-LINAC的平均几何变形为0.94 +/- 0.58毫米,3.0T扫描仪的平均几何变形为0.90 +/- 0.53 mm,直径为400毫米的相关体积为1.15 +/- 0.62 mm。如预期的那样,GD随着BW的降低而增加,并具有2D与3D校正算法。归因于幻影设置的GD差异为0.13 mm或更少。这两个软件应用程序的GD差异小于0.07 mm。
MRI offers outstanding soft tissue contrast that may reduce uncertainties in target and organ-at-risk delineation and enable online adaptive image-guided treatment. Spatial distortions resulting from non-linearities in the gradient fields and non-uniformity in the main magnetic field must be accounted for across the imaging field-of-view to prevent systematic errors during treatment delivery. This work presents a modular phantom and software application to characterize geometric distortion (GD) within the large field-of-view MRI images required for radiation therapy simulation. The modular phantom is assembled from a series of rectangular foam blocks containing high-contrast fiducial markers in a known configuration. The modular phantom design facilitates transportation of the phantom between different MR scanners and MR-guided linear accelerators and allows the phantom to be adapted to fit different sized bores or coils. The phantom was evaluated using a 1.5T MR-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) and 1.5T and 3.0T diagnostic scanners. Performance was assessed by varying acquisition parameters to induce image distortions in a known manner. Imaging was performed using T1 and T2 weighted pulse sequences with 2D and 3D distortion correction algorithms and the receiver bandwidth (BW) varied as 250-815 Hz/pixel. Phantom set-up reproducibility was evaluated across independent set-ups. The software was validated by comparison with a non-modular phantom. Average geometric distortion was 0.94+/-0.58 mm for the MR-Linac, 0.90+/-0.53 mm for the 1.5 T scanner, and 1.15+/-0.62 mm for the 3.0T scanner, for a 400 mm diameter volume-of-interest. GD increased, as expected, with decreasing BW, and with the 2D versus 3D correction algorithm. Differences in GD attributed to phantom set-up were 0.13 mm or less. Differences in GD for the two software applications were less than 0.07 mm.